The benchmark we had to invent

The Historical Allocation Benchmark™

Your Historical Allocation Benchmark™ (HAB™) is a personalized index built from your actual asset mix, using passive market indexes. Returns and Risk are measured directly against your HAB™. It reconstructs the exact mix you actually held, period by period, and asks one honest question: what would those same allocations have earned, at zero cost?

The HAB™ describes a passive-allocation reference, not a recommendation to invest in the named indexes. It is not an investable product and has no fees or trading costs. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

The problem with a static benchmark

"You beat the S&P 500" can mean almost nothing.

If a portfolio holds bonds, international, and cash, comparing it to an all-stock index isn't a fair fight. And a "static 60/40" stays frozen all year — but your account never does. You rebalance, allocations shift, the market moves your mix daily. Measured against a benchmark that never moved, your true performance gets blurred.

Here's the part the industry rarely says out loud: that blur cuts both ways. A mismatched benchmark can quietly mask underperformance — or it can hide performance that was actually better than it looked. Either way, you can't see clearly. Not knowing is the problem, in either direction.
Why a fixed benchmark is unfair

Your allocation doesn't sit still. Your benchmark shouldn't either.

Beginning
65 / 25 / 10
Middle
55 / 35 / 10
End
45 / 45 / 10
Equities Fixed income Cash
What a static benchmark assumes instead
Static 60 / 40 — frozen for the entire period

This account moved from 65/25/10 to 45/45/10. Judging it against a benchmark that pretended it stayed 60/40 the whole time isn't a comparison — it's a mismatch. The HAB measures against exactly what you held, when you held it.

How the HAB works

You vs. you — at zero cost.

01

Reconstruct your real mix

We read your connected accounts to rebuild your actual asset allocation at each point in time — equities, fixed income, cash, and other — from real data, not estimates.

02

Map each slice to a zero-cost index

Every slice is matched to its institutional index equivalent and measured against daily returns — the same data professionals pay for.

03

Compound it into one benchmark

The result is a custom benchmark answering one question no advisor can dodge: how your exact allocation would have tracked against passive index proxies — a passive version of your own mix, before costs. You can't invest directly in an index; this is a comparison, not a return you could have captured. Patent pending.

Why this is hard to get anywhere else

Why uploading statements to a chatbot can't do this.

We're not knocking AI — we use it ourselves. But a benchmark you'll rely on for real money should be accountable. Here's the honest difference.

Daily market data

The HAB is measured against daily index returns. Recreating that needs a paid daily market-data feed most investors don't have — and a general AI assistant can't access that data at all.

A method, not a prompt

The HAB is a structured, patent-pending engine that produces the same answer every time. Ask a chatbot the same question twice and you'll often get two different numbers.

It's insured

Every analysis is backed by $2,000,000 in cyber-liability protection. A free chatbot session carries none of that.

We stand behind the output

We build to FINRA 2210 and the SEC Marketing Rule and put our name on the result. Most AI tools disclaim everything and stand behind nothing.

Why we built it

We didn't set out to invent a benchmark.

We set out to bring objective analysis to investors — and found we couldn't, until we solved the benchmarking problem that has shadowed this industry since its beginning. So we built the Historical Allocation Benchmark™ and made it the engine behind every TriScore™.

HAB DISCLOSURE. The Historical Allocation Benchmark™ is generated from an account's historical asset allocation applied to passive index proxies; it does not represent actual investment results. Direct investment in an index is not possible. Actual investment would produce different results due to fees, timing, and other factors. Historical analysis only — not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Past performance does not guarantee future results.